Re: space problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: space problem
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:47:19 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1d55864b45a6e455084cee09c3754163.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
> Actually, IIRC, one directory was 42G, and the other was 15G or so. That,
> along with reducing the reserved blocks on the f/s should have given me
> 3%-4%. I know that; what's driving me nuts is df, not df -h, is showing
> "available" as a blank.
>
> Oh, and for the other folks who wondered, we use rsync with hard links.
>
So... are you sure the things you removed to clear space were the
_last_ hardlinks to the data? Otherwise, for the same reason you use
the links to save space, you don't get the space back.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: space problem
- From: m . roth
- Re: space problem
- References:
- space problem
- From: m . roth
- Re: space problem
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Re: space problem
- From: m . roth
- space problem
- Prev by Date: Re: space problem
- Next by Date: Re: Update issue - tar package problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: space problem
- Next by thread: Re: space problem
- Index(es):
[CentOS] [CentOS Announce] [CentOS Docs] [CentOS Virtualization] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [Photo] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Xfree86] [Linux USB] [Project Hail Cloud Computing]
 |
 |