Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:06:04 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20120404165157.GA23860@mercury.spuddy.org>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I know, I know... don't use the non-standard kernels unless you have to... > > BUT: I have a D-Link N150 USB card. > > Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0846:9030 NetGear, Inc. WNA1100 Wireless-N 150 [Atheros AR9271] OK, we are back here. Your device seems to be supported by ELRepo's kmod-compat-wireless. Details are here: http://elrepoproject.blogspot.com/2012/03/one-size-fits-all-compat-wireless-fits.html So, give it a try. :) Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- References:
- 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris
- 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Prev by Date: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Next by Date: Re: Centos 5.6 Kernel Panics
- Previous by thread: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Next by thread: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Index(es):
[CentOS] [CentOS Announce] [CentOS Docs] [CentOS Virtualization] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [Photo] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Xfree86] [Linux USB] [Project Hail Cloud Computing]
 |
 |