Re: HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Friday 09 March 2012 08.44.53 Sorin Srbu wrote:
...
> What are some of the cases it would be practical/best to have it off?
> 
> I know there might be some negative performance issues with certain
> applications, but would you notice it in day-to-day use?

Negative performance due to HT comes in several flavours. Some compute 
intensive loads simply perform a bit better with HT off (usually measureable 
but not really noticeable, 1-10% is expected here). Another way HT can cause 
you performance degradation is due to incorrect scheduling and/or pinning. 
What happens then is that two threads are (incorrectly) put on the same core 
instead of using two cores (impact: ~half performance).

On the positive side, if you have many (preferably independent) threads you'll 
often get both better throughput and better system response/latency (more 
"processors" available for the kernel to schedule on).

/Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Photo]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

Powered by Linux Add to Google