Re: Linux GUI FAQ/tutorial?

[Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Another package good to install is edbrowse and after installation copy 
the ebsetup script out of the /usr/share/edbrowse/directory tree to a user 
account and run it as the local user not root and it will finish your 
installation of edbrowse for you.On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, 
trev.saunders@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > > Use speakup if you will be using the command line heavily -- I believe
> > > it comes with vinux, but if not you'll have to install the modules
> > > yourself. (I don't use vinux.)
> >
> > Do you know if Speakup works with a software synthesizer?
>
> yes, it works very well with espeak, and can support other software synths through speech-dispatcher.
>
> > > - install MySQL, Apache2, Perl, and use cpan for compiling and
> > > installing some perl modules;
> >
> > > Apt can install most if not all of these.
> >
> > I can compile them, no problem, but I would like to be able to read the
> > console for seeing at least the last screen displayed, for viewing errors...
> > but I guess Speakup can do this.
>
> unless you have a very good reason use the packagemanager.  The packagemanager will deal with the dependencies for you, and will generally make your life a lot easier.  If you really want to control compile options and compile from source you might want to look into gentoo.  But yes speakup is a good console screen reader, and compiling will be possible if necessary.
>
> > > - use an accessible editor, an accessible browser and an accessible
> > > email client.
> >
> > > I'm a fan of command line apps -- I like emacs, as it can do a lot
> > > eg. automatically do your indentation. Also you should use emacspeak
> > > with it to take advantage of all it's features. Vi, nano and most of the
> > > other editors are fine with speakup, emacs will work with speakup, but
> > > you'll have a better experience with emacspeak.
> >
> > Well, I have tried Emacspeak in the past but I didn't find it nice enough. I
> > don't like to need remembering anything, and I like to find all the features
> > the editor offers in menus or in other ways, but not in help files.
> > A Linux clone of TextPad or EditPlus or UltraEdit would be very good.
> >
> > Nano is nice, but it doesn't use (as far as I know) the possibility of
> > finding/replacing using regular expressions, the possibility of running the
> > currently opened file with a certain interpreter and storing the results
> > from STDOUT and STDERR in another accessible window, and many other missing
> > features.
> >
> > My biggest fear is that I won't find a good editor under Linux, but only
> > extremes - powerful editors like Emacs and vi that have a very old and
> > strange interface, or easy to use editors like nano or pico that don't have
> > more features than Notepad.
> >
> > Octavian
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blinux-list mailing list
> > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list