Re: [dm-devel] Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:10:02PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
I agree with moving the partition detection code to user space, but trying to undo it after the fact doesn't help because udev is already processing the add events. Also you do not need to remove the partitions so long as pvscan understands that it shouldn't be using them.
which is the modification i proposed to lvm tools, isn't it?
Udev is supposed to be the new model for enumerating devices and
i know that, and i will withdraw from this discussion, since it might get to an useless flame war. Is there any technical reason for not having lvm tools filter out devices that are used by device mapper? besides dmraid, think of multipath. Regards, L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ _______________________________________________ Ataraid-list mailing list Ataraid-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ataraid-list