Re: Hangup Cause and SIP Response Code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 04/25/2012 05:29 PM, Eric Wieling wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 6:25 PM
To: asterisk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Hangup Cause and SIP Response Code

On 04/25/2012 04:45 PM, BryantZ@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I am using 1.8.x&   10.x

Then you have SIP_CAUSE available, although you'll have to enable it because it is off by default due to performance concerns.


Does anyone know what kind of performance hit you take from SIP_CAUSE when you are using few or no calls using chan_local?

The performance impact will be directly related to the number of outbound SIP channels you create; no other channels will be involved. We had a Digium OEM customer observe a 50% call load capability decrease when they started using SIP_CAUSE, but that was on a pretty busy system, and all the channels were SIP channels.

Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | SIP: kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at &

-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

[Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [100% Free Online Dating]     [Yosemite News]     [Arts & Crafts]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]

Add to Google Powered by Linux