Re: framebuffer driver on s3c6xx in 2.6.30kernel.

[misha <misha212001@xxxxxxx>]

Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:58:38PM +0300, Mikhail wrote:
>   
>> Hello.
>>
>> I've compiled recent 2.6.30 kernel for s3c6400 processor with default
>> configuration for smdk6400.
>>     
>
> Is this a straight 2.6.30, or one of the 2.6.30-git releases. The s3c64xx
> project is ongoing.
>   
I've use straight 2.6.30.
> I've not tried the fb driver on the smdk for a while, it was developed
> for the OpenMoko and the S3C6410. Whilst it should work for the S3C6400
> I'll try and test it in the next couple of days.
>
>   
I've got smdk6410 board - result is the same (configuration in the 
kernel is only one).
According to datasheet - no differences between 400 and 410 in 
framebuffer subsystem.
I've used and oscilloscope to test nets - no toggling at all. so I 
suppose LCD controller itself do not operate.
I'm would very surprised if this kernel configuration will work on 
openmoko or any other boards

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php