|
|
|
Re: Reverse engineering AT91RM9200 board | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:42:19 +1100, Aras Vaichas <arasv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> viper@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> - U-boot is now 1.1.1 and want to change it. How can this be done?
> Download the latest U-Boot and see if there is already support for your
> board, otherwise you can ask the manufacturer for the board specific
> patches. Otherwise, you will have to make your own board support. Try
> the U-Boot mailing list for further information.
I don't know anything about the board an no one will tell me anything about
it :( What I See Is What I Get :)
>
>> And how is U-boot loaded?
>>
> Do you mean "how is it burned into the Flash", or "where does it boot
> from"?
>
> U-Boot can boot from NOR flash (execute in place), or the first stage
> bootloader can copy it from NAND/Dataflash into SDRAM and then execute
it.
>
> U-Boot can be programmed into your device via the first stage
> bootloader, or via JTAG into the NOR/Dataflash.
>
>> There's no DataFlash on the board, and as I can see
>> everything is loaded from the NAND.
>>
> Look harder. The at91rm9200 cannot boot from NAND, so there has to be
> another memory device.
>
> Is the memory OneNAND? What does dmesg say about the memory devices on
> the board?
Just one MX29LV320CTTC-70G flash, which is NOR, as I looked up. Problemo
uno solved :)
>
>> Is it possible, that there's no
>> "first-stage" boot loader like Darell loader, or Atmel's own?
>>
> AFAIK, this is only the case where you have NOR flash.
So, if it's a NOR flash, than no first-stage bootloader? Changing U-boot
than is "just" writing it from the booted sys (get image via nfs)?
The partitions (from dmesg):
Flash device: 0x400000 at 0x10000000
Physically mapped flash: mtfs filesystem found at block 1118
Creating 6 MTD partitions on "Physically mapped flash":
0x00000000-0x00020000 : "bootcode"
0x00020000-0x003b0000 : "linux"
0x00117b84-0x003b0000 : "rootfs"
0x003b0000-0x003d0000 : "nvram"
>
>
>> - Kernel is 2.4.27 now. Tried to boot up a 2.6.26.8 via NFS, but got
> "Bad
>> magic number". What's that? ( compiled a kernel for AT91RM9200BGA with
>> nearly default config )
>>
Maybe it's u-boot, sincs my mkimage is for 1.1.4...
> It wasn't a U-Boot image, or the image was corrupt. This is how I make
> my image:
>
> make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=${CROSS_PATH}
> INSTALL_MOD_PATH=${FS_PATH} Image
> ${CROSS_PATH}/objcopy -O binary -S vmlinux linux.bin
>
> # zip up the file
> rm linux.bin.gz
> gzip -v9 linux.bin
>
> # create the U-Boot image
> ${MKIMAGE} -A arm -O linux -C gzip -a 0x20008000 -e 0x20008000
> -d linux.bin.gz uImage
>
>> - How can I make a correct board file for the board?
> U-Boot or Linux?
>
> Copy one of the other at91rm9200 board files and customize it for your
> board.
>
>> How can I get the NAND
>> partitions, etc? ( most options I can configure )
>>
> What do you mean "get"?
>
> dmesg should show you how any partitions are configured.
>
> Try:
> # cat /proc/partitions
> # cat /proc/mtd
>
> and see what it says.
>
> To set NAND up in your board file, have a look at:
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dk.c
>
> static struct mtd_partition __initdata dk_nand_partition[] = {
> {
> .name = "NAND Partition 1",
> .offset = 0,
> .size = MTDPART_SIZ_FULL,
> },
> };
>
> static struct mtd_partition * __init nand_partitions(int size, int
> *num_partitions)
> {
> *num_partitions = ARRAY_SIZE(dk_nand_partition);
> return dk_nand_partition;
> }
>
> static struct at91_nand_data __initdata dk_nand_data = {
> .ale = 22,
> .cle = 21,
> .det_pin = AT91_PIN_PB1,
> .rdy_pin = AT91_PIN_PC2,
> // .enable_pin = ... not there
> .partition_info = nand_partitions,
> };
>
>> - What's the easiest way to get the GPIO pins visible on the board?
>>
> There is kernel support, but I'm not sure of the current status. There
> are a few user space applications around:
>
> http://wiki.emqbit.com/at91-gpio
>
> I use the one of this page:
> http://dwisasongko.890m.com/User%20Space%20-%20Kernel%20space/
>
> Aras
>
>
Thanks,
Tom
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
[Linux ARM] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]
![]() |
![]() |