|
|
|
Re: What is the minimum arm processor architecture for reliably running Linux? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
|
Craig Cervo wrote: > Can anyone share their real world experience? I'm a big fan of the SAM9 chips right now. They're reasonably fast (integer-only machines), inexpensive, and have a ton of useful peripherals. But at the moment, the APIs within Linux to do motor control are a bit limited. So either (a) you're going to have to write some code, or (b) you'll still have to hand-off the motor control stuff to a subordinate processor connected via, say, SPI or I2C. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
[Linux ARM] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]
![]() |
![]() |