Re: modem not responding

[Michael Opdenacker <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Russel,

> Maybe the way to break this once and for all is to split this list so
> that obsolete 2.4 stuff ends up on linux-arm-kernel-obsolete, so that
> those of us who wish to move forward can do so without having to
> constantly waste our time reading messages about obsolete kernels.
> I'm sure I can create some exim filters which will provide adequate
> protection against mis-posts between either list when kernel versions
> are mentioned.
You're right!

However, you may just need to state new rules in the mailing liste 
etiquette page, such as

   * Sticking to versions of kernel and tools older that the current
     stable ones can make sense for commercial, deadline driven
     projects. However, do not expect and do not try to get support
     from this online community. If you can't fix your issues by
     yourself, get commercial support services. Plenty of providers are
     available.
   * If you can't pay this price, you will have to pay the price of
     upgrading your project to the latest stable versions. Then, you
     will share the same goals as this online community and your
     messages will be welcome again.

That was just a suggestion...

:-)

   Michael.

--
Michael Opdenacker
http://free-electrons.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php