Re: modem not responding

[Bill Gatliff <bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ben:

Ben Dooks wrote:

> I am interested to find out why people seem to be so keen on sticking to obsolete kernels.
>  

I wouldn't use the term "obsolete" to describe the 2.4 ARM kernels.  
Rather, that's where the complete and/or mature peripheral support lies, 
especially for AT91RM9200.  I'm guessing the same thing is true for the 
Sharp LHx SOCs.

As far as I can tell, the best term to describe 2.6 is "preliminary" as 
the list of stuff that works in 2.4 vs. 2.6 for many ARM SOC targets is 
very, very short.  I'm doing the best I can for AT91RM9200, but in the 
meantime I have customers who need stuff to Just Work.


b.g.
--

Bill Gatliff
Embedded Linux development and training services.
bgat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php