Re: 5088/3: the SPI dependency

[Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>]

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> 1. I was not informed that this patch relied upon the max7301 SPI
>    support, until I found that it didn't build.

I did mention this in an email to Eric, when getting his ack to this 
patch. But as I was submitting this patch to the patch system, I didn't 
know (and I still don't) if and how one can provide comments to a patch 
without them being included in the commit text. Like that provided in 
normal patches between the "---" line and the patch body. Is this 
possible? If yes, maybe it would be a good idea to extend the patch-system 
help with this information.

Anyway, sorry for not communicating this clearly.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ:        http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette:  http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php