On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:09:44PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:07:57AM +0100, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: > > Rob said that the old forms should be marked as deprecated, but I didn't > > deprecate any "dialog" or "diasemi" entries in this patch because I have > > only made two types of change: > > (1) definitions of "diasemi" or "dialog" that have not been used in the kernel; > > (2) definitions of "diasemi" or "dialog" that are incompatible with existing driver code. > > In both of these cases they cannot affect any working DTB. > Ok, that sounds fine then. That just wasn't immediately obvious. > Could you please note those facts in the commit message when you next > post? I thought we were already trying to do the stable ABI thing in wich case at least the first case (where we just happen to not have in tree DTs using the identifiers) should still remain supported? It's not like it really costs us anything to do it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel