On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:21:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > As a legacy of the way 32 bit ARM did things the topology code uses a null > topology map by default and then overwrites it by mapping cores with no > information to a cluster by themselves later. In order to make it simpler > to reset things as part of recovering from parse failures in firmware > information directly set this configuration on init. A core will always be > its own sibling so there should be no risk of confusion with firmware > provided information. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > index 3e06b0be4ec8..ff662b23af5f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c > @@ -43,9 +43,6 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid) > * reset it to default behaviour > */ > pr_debug("CPU%u: No topology information configured\n", cpuid); > - cpuid_topo->core_id = 0; > - cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpuid_topo->core_sibling); > - cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling); > return; > } > > @@ -87,9 +84,12 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void) > struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu]; > > cpu_topo->thread_id = -1; > - cpu_topo->core_id = -1; > + cpu_topo->core_id = 0; > cpu_topo->cluster_id = -1; > + > cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling); > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling); > cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->thread_sibling); > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->thread_sibling); > } > } Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel