Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for Freescale i.MX GPC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arnd,

[adding Samsung guys into the loop]

Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2014 16:34:41 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > +
> > +Example of a device that is part of a power domain:
> > +
> > +       vpu: vpu@02040000 {
> > +               reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>;
> > +               /* ... */
> > +               fsl,power-domain = <&pd_pu>;
> > +               /* ... */
> > +       };
> > +
> 
> I'm really not too happy about platforms starting to add random
> bindings for power domains. Unfortunately I didn't catch exynos
> doing this first, but I don't want to see another platform like
> that.
> 
> Can we please come up with a proper generic power domain binding
> first and then add platform specific users?

what is the process here? I've seen the samsung bindings and copied the
pattern. I guess the Exynos bindings are set in stone, and the i.MX
power domains can be handled using the same bindings.

regards
Philipp


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]