Re: [PATCH RFC v3 3/3] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:39:56AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

[...]

> > +	- cache-state-retained
> > +		Usage: See definition
> > +		Value type: <none>
> > +		Definition: if present cache memory is retained on power down,
> > +			    otherwise it is lost.
> 
> Might be better to define which caches?

I do not expect caches in the same power domain to have different retention
capabilities, so a flag per-state should be enough. If anyone is unhappy
about this please flag it up. List of caches affected can be retrieved by
walking the power-domain specifiers and check those against the caches power
domains.

Thanks,
Lorenzo


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]