Dear Jean-Jacques Hiblot, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:23:51 +0100, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote: > The second parameter of of_read_number is not the index, but a size. > As it happens, in this case it may work just fine because of the the conversion > to u32 and the favorable endianness on this architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c > index c269e43..877e8ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c > @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ static int mvebu_get_tgt_attr(struct device_node *np, int devfn, > > for (i = 0; i < nranges; i++) { > u32 flags = of_read_number(range, 1); > - u32 slot = of_read_number(range, 2); > + u32 slot = of_read_number(range + 1, 1); > u64 cpuaddr = of_read_number(range + na, pna); > unsigned long rtype; > Sorry for the long delay, and thanks for the fix! Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (on Armada 370, with PCIe cards plugged in) Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel