On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
The core idle loop now takes care of it. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c index 3fb8d95ab8..4505e2a950 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c @@ -298,10 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void) */ void arch_cpu_idle(void) { - if (cpuidle_idle_call()) - x86_idle(); - else - local_irq_enable();
For the record, it was pointless to enable the local irq here because it is handled by the cpuidle framework when exiting the idle state.
+ x86_idle(); } /*
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel