Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] arm64: topology: Provide relative power numbers for cores

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:43:10PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> The other option here is runtime tunables via sysfs or whatever which
> avoids baking numbers into the DT in the same way, though that is partly
> just a punt of the same problem to userspace.  That's probably also more
> helpful to people doing the tuning since it can be tweaked dynamically.

One other thing on this which occurred to me later on: if we do want to
make these values directly tunable we probably want to do that from the
scheduler rather than individual architectures.  These are scheduler
interfaces and the issues which make tuning desirable are essentially
architecture neutral ones.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]