Re: AArch64 kernel image decompression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Bhupesh,

In message <819346bb83b04348a266643afd5bd6f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
>
> I agree with Marek. Usually for non-cryptographic-secure (key based cryptography) boot
> method the CRC protection is usually the best possible protection against Image
> corruption. CRC check is usually used in a number of field-deployed solutions to ensure
> linux image sanity. 

The FIT image approach as suggested by Marek also allows for secure
boot methods (like cryptographically signed images); this is used in
production for several systems, including the Google Chromebook.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@xxxxxxx
Each honest calling, each walk of life, has its own  elite,  its  own
aristocracy based on excellence of performance. - James Bryant Conant

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]