Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: topology: Implement basic CPU topology support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:19:39PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:

> For topology meaning, it may be better to have cluster concept there.
> And don't know if there will has a real ARM NUMA system for 64bit
> server. If so, socket_id is good in a NUMA system.

The scheduler does have a separate NUMA node ID that we're not currently
using which I'd have expected to be a better fit for actual NUMA stuff;
looking at the options we've got it's not clear to me that with what the
scheduler has at the minute sockets aren't a good mapping for what the
hardware has.  There doesn't seem to be anything between threaded cores
and physical packages.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]