Re: [PATCH 08/10] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:07:47AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

> require slightly different flags to inform the core that we 'are'
> booting with DT.

Is there some situation when we would want to say we're booting from DT
when we aren't?  Just wondering about the quotes.

> +static const struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config ux500_dmaengine_of_pcm_config = {
> +	.pcm_hardware = &ux500_pcm_hw,
> +	.prealloc_buffer_size = 128 * 1024,

You shouldn't need to set this explicitly, the generic code should be
able to pick a number for you - if you do need this number please
explain why the number was chosen in the comments (or fix the core to
guess better).  At the minute the core just makes up a number too but at
least then it's a consistent random number between platforms.

Can you also get away without the pcm_hardware - the core should also
have support for discovering this by querying the DMA controller?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]