|
|
RE: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: Print an error message if no match exists for a hwmod class |
Hi Vaibhav On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 19:35:50, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > It doesn't seem to me that this would necessarily always be an error. > > Suppose some init code to create cpsw devices is running on an OMAP3430. > > Then a omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class() that doesn't locate anything > > wouldn't be an error, right? > > Well, I think a failed lookup operation will be a bit expensive since it > iterates over the whole list of registered hwmods and hence put in the > pr_err(). If performance is a serious problem there, we can maintain a list of hwmod pointers inside each struct omap_hwmod_class, updated when the hwmods are registered. But as far as I know, performance hasn't been an issue here yet. If performance is the real motivation, I'd rather see an implementation of per-class lists as described above. > But I don't see how the SoC specific example that you pointed out > could be handled without putting in cpu_is_* checks in the registration > process itself :( Hmm, why not? To continue the earlier example, the init code in the platform code simply calls omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class(), and creates the appropriate device if anything was found. If no cpsw IP blocks are present on a given SoC, nothing would happen. No cpu_is_*() would be needed. - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |