Re: [PATCH 2/16] SPI: Refactor spi-orion to use SPI framework queue.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:53:28AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > You can see the chain of dependencies here. So at minimum i would need > to send the first three via Mark. I then need to cross my fingers and > hope he really picks them up, because without them, we are going to > have a number of boards which fail to find their root file system on > an SPI flash. Well, I'd like to think that generally I'm reasonably responsive to patch submissions and obviously there's no great urgency here since we're in the merge window - nothing is likely to go in until 3.7 anyway, though it'd be handy if the DT updates went in early (and they're very low risk...). > Now, maybe i've done all this wrong, since i'm a newbie to collecting > patches together for submission upstream.... The general pattern with these things should be that the patches get sent via the normal route and any unusual requirements discussed then. To be honest it doesn't seem like there's much problem here, you've got no build time dependencies or anything.
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]