|
|
Re: linux-next: adding the common clk tree |
On 20120628-00:29, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:05:03 -0700 Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So please let me know if I still have the concept wrong and I'll change > > things up. Otherwise my clk-next fulfils all of the guidelines you've > > mentioned below for inclusion into linux-next. > > OK, that all seems to be fine. I would make one suggestion: that you > create the clk-next branch like this: > > git checkout clk-next > git reset --hard clk-3.x > git merge clk-fixes > git am patches/clk/next/incoming/*.patch > > or maybe just merge clk-fixes directly into clk-3.x when necessary or > from time to time and base clk-next just in clk-3.x. Using clk-3.x as a base for clk-next sounds fine to me. I'll use the approach you outlined above. Thanks much, Mike > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |