|
|
Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers |
Hi Arnd, On 06/14/2012 06:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: [snip] > This would let us handle the following cases very easily: > > 1. one read-write channel > > dmas = <&dmac 0x3 match>; > > 2. a choice of two read-write channels: > > dmas = <&dmacA 0x3 matchA>, <&dmacB 0x3 matchB>; > > 3. one read-channel, one write channel: > > dmas = <&dmac 0x1 match-read>, <&dmac 0x2 match-write>; > > 4. a choice of two read channels and one write channel: > > dmas = <&dmacA 0x1 match-readA>, <&dmacA 0x2 match-write> > <&dmacB match-readB>; > > And only the cases where we have more multiple channels that differ > in more aspects would require named properties: > > 5. two different channels > > dmas = <&dmac 0x3 match-rwdata>, <&dmac 0x1 match-status>; > dma-names = "rwdata", "status"; > > 6. same as 5, but with a choice of channels: > > dmas = <&dmacA 0x3 match-rwdataA>, <&dmacA 0x1 match-status>; > <dmacB 0x3 match-rwdataB>; > dma-names = "rwdata", "status", "rwdata"; > > > With a definition like that, we can implement a very simple device > driver interface for the common cases, and a slightly more complex > one for the more complex cases: > > 1. chan = of_dma_request_channel(dev->of_node, 0); > 2. chan = of_dma_request_channel(dev->of_node, 0); > 3. rxchan = of_dma_request_channel(dev->of_node, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV); > txchan = of_dma_request_channel(dev->of_node, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM); > 4. rxchan = of_dma_request_channel(dev->of_node, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV); > txchan = of_dma_request_channel(dev->of_node, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM); > 5. chan = of_dma_request_named_channel(dev->of_node, "rwdata", 0); > auxchan = of_dma_request_named_channel(dev->of_node, "status", DMA_DEV_TO_MEM); > 6. chan = of_dma_request_named_channel(dev->of_node, "rwdata", 0); > auxchan = of_dma_request_named_channel(dev->of_node, "status", DMA_DEV_TO_MEM); In the above examples, did you imply that the of_dma_request_channel() function would return a type of "struct dma_chan" and so be calling dma_request_channel() underneath? I am been prototyping something, but wanted to make sure I am completely aligned on this :-) Cheers Jon _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |