|
|
Re: [PATCH 09/17] i2c: omap: ack IRQ in parts |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:20:17PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:20:42PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > According to flow diagrams on OMAP TRMs, > > we should ACK the IRQ as they happen. > > You don't explain that you're adding a new dev_err() statement into the > driver for a missing acknowledge. > > What if you're probing for a device - can this cause spam to the kernel > console? What if you have protocol mangling enabled with the "ignore > lack of ack bit set" ? indeed... maybe dev_vdbg() would fit better, or just don't add anything. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |