On 20120606-11:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:41:30PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > caching parent clocks makes sense only when a clock has more > > than one parent (mux clocks). > > Avoid doing this for every other clock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > > index 687b00d..40568e9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > > @@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk) > > * If clk->parents is not NULL we skip this entire block. This allows > > * for clock drivers to statically initialize clk->parents. > > */ > > - if (clk->num_parents && !clk->parents) { > > + if ((clk->num_parents > 1) && !clk->parents) { > > You don't need the additional parens here. Please learn the C precedence > rules. Additional unnecessary parens can make expressions much harder > to read. Rajendra, I've taken this patch into clk-next for testing. I've fixed up the extra parens locally, so no need for a resend. Regards, Mike _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel