Re: [RFC 00/24] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock

[Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>]

On Monday 04 June 2012 07:21 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > I was infact thinking of moving these files into mach-omap1/ since they
> > >  are now OMAP1 specific. Is your concern coming mainly from the clksel
> > >  structs that you will need to be shared across OMAP1 and OMAP2+?
> Yes, especially if we plan to move omap1 to the common clock framework.
>
> > >  The right thing to do seems like is to move OMAP1 across to COMMON clk
> > >  also and keep the plat clock.h and get rid of plat clock.c completely.
> > >  But for now, I really haven;t looked at OMAP1 migration as all.
> Yes that would make sense. Do you have plans to do this or not yet?

At-least my plan for this series was to address only OMAP2+.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel