Re: [RFC PATCH] clk: add extension API

["Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@xxxxxx>]

On 5/31/2012 3:04 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:50:00PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>
> > Now the question is should we extend the Linux device structure to
> > handle such HW IP, or should we extend the clock definition to
> > handle this kind of extended clock node.
>
> > It looks to me that this kind of function does belong to the device
> > more than to the clock node.
>
> This is looking a lot like what power domains do to me...

Do you mean the reset part?



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel