|
|
Re: [PATCHv2 04/19] ARM: OMAP4: PM: save/restore all DPLL settings in OFF mode |
"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh > <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh >> <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> writes: >>>> > [...] >>>> - Rather than hooking into omap4_enter_lowpower(), should use >>>> the cluster PM enter/exit notifier chain. >>>> >>> This is again specific to device OFF only and not related to CPU >>> cluster state as such. So I don't think notifiers should be used here. >>> >>> O.w even when we attempt just MPU OSWR C-state, all these functions will >>> get called in notifier chain. >>> >> Just a thought, we can have a separate notifier chain for device OFF. It can >> allow use to get rid of 'enable_off_mode" kind of flags and can be >> used by many drivers too. > > Like the overall idea, but one minor dumb concern might be sequencing > of notifiers > - OFF entry and restore needs things to be executed in a specific sequence. > How do we plan to ensure the sequence is maintained in a notifier call > chain? one > possible option might be a "priority" based scheme? Or just combine the events that need a specific sequence into single notifier callback function. Kevin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |