On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:07:41AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > 于 2012年05月25日 01:30, Sascha Hauer 写道: > >On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:50:56PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > >>add the clock for apbh-dma. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie<b32955@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c | 3 ++- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c > >>index cab02d0..12d9040 100644 > >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c > >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c > >>@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ int __init mx6q_clocks_init(void) > >> clk[ahb] = imx_clk_busy_divider("ahb", "periph", base + 0x14, 10, 3, base + 0x48, 1); > >> > >> /* name parent_name reg shift */ > >>- clk[apbh_dma] = imx_clk_gate2("apbh_dma", "ahb", base + 0x68, 4); > >>+ clk[apbh_dma] = imx_clk_gate2("apbh_dma", "usdhc3", base + 0x68, 4); > >This change looks strange. Is this correct? > yes. it's correct. > > The datasheet about the clock tells us the parent of the apbh-dma is usdhc3. > I guess it's a hardware bug. -- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel