|
|
Re: [PATCH] ixp4xx: fix compilation by adding gpiolib support |
On Thursday 24 May 2012, Imre Kaloz wrote: > The gpiolib patch originated from me as well. I've changed the author tag in the changeset to you now, and noted the fact that Richard submitted it. > > What is the plan for ixp4xx going forward? Is one of you planning to > > maintain a git tree and collect patches for inclusion in arm-soc? > > I would be more comfortable just knowing where to pull from than > > having to watch the mailing list and making sure the maintainers > > Ack all the patches. > > > > If there is no tree, should we downgrade ixp4xx in the MAINTAINERS > > file from "Maintained" to "Odd fixes"? > > Quite some patches are still in the OpenWrt repo only. When I'll have > time, I'll revisit those as well as migrate ixp4xx to DT. I'm overloaded > with work, so I'll need a few more weeks and I guess the same is true for > Krzysztof as well.. Ok, good to hear that you're still interested! I don't get the impression that migrating ixp4xx to DT is urgent in any way, but I also don't think it will be too much work. If all you want to do is allow the board files to be replaced with DT, then I assume you need bindings for the flash, ethernet and CF devices and convert the interrupt controller to use irq domains. For PCI, it should be enough to provide a generic map_irq function that uses the standard interrupt-maps property. That function can even be defined in a way that is usable independent of the platform. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |