Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] usb: chipidea: add imx driver binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:56:52PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > Do you think it's a good idea to let user select binding driver directly
> > and the binding driver config depends on chipidea config?
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion on this, although I prefer it the way it
> is now, because, imo:
> 
>   * in case of =m (and that's the only sane way of compiling it anyway),
>     these all are compiled as modules, which you simply don't install if
>     you don't want them;
>   * all of them get compile-tested every time you change something in
>     the driver, which is a good thing;

only true for $(ARCH) builds. I would like to see these drivers being
compile tested on linux-next on all arches. Thus the patches I just
sent.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]

  Powered by Linux