ARM: iMX: lockup with irqs disabled in drivers/tty/imx.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hi All,

I've found a lockup (interrupts disabled, infinite loop) in drivers/tty/imx.c. This is on i.MX53 (Karo module), using the Karo BSP, but having checked the arm-soc git tree, I think the bug is here too. The Linaro tree(s) look the same.

I see the problem when the UART is setup to not have rtscts, so port->have_rtscts = 0 in the driver. Additionally there is nothing hanging on the serial port (in my case the peripheral isn't yet powered up) so the rx line is low.

I can then trigger the lockup by simply booting the unit and issuing "echo > /dev/ttymxc1". The same can be done on the other ports too. Once locked, magic sys-req appears not to work, pinging the target is dead etc...

The sequence of events in the kernel goes something like this:

1) imx_startup()
2) imx_int()
      \-> imx_rxint()
            |-> URXD0 returns 0xd800
            \-> tty_insert_flip_char(tty, 0, TTY_BREAK)
...
3) imx_start_tx()
      \-> imx_transmit_buffer()
             Writes '^' '@'
4) imx_set_termios()
      \-> hangs when waiting for USR2_TXDC

The problem is that UCR2_IRTS isn't yet set (that comes later in imx_set_termios()), so the transmitter is waiting for the pin to be asserted before it can serialise out from its FIFO and set the USR2_TXDC bit. Since CTS/RTS will never come on this port, we end up spinning in the following bit of code in imx_set_termios():948, having earlier called spin_lock_irqsave():

	while ( !(readl(sport->port.membase + USR2) & USR2_TXDC))
		barrier();

The tx was a surprise to me; it looks like the receiver sees the low rx pin as a break which then, I think, causes a local echo sending back '^@', as per the following stack:

(imx_start_tx+0x60/0x12c)       from (__uart_start+0x44/0x48)
(__uart_start+0x44/0x48)        from (uart_start+0x20/0x4c)
(uart_start+0x20/0x4c)          from (process_echoes+0x25c/0x260)
(process_echoes+0x25c/0x260)    from (n_tty_receive_buf+0xc90/0xf04)
(n_tty_receive_buf+0xc90/0xf04) from (flush_to_ldisc+0xfc/0x1b0)
(flush_to_ldisc+0xfc/0x1b0)     from (process_one_work+0x1fc/0x330)
(process_one_work+0x1fc/0x330)  from (worker_thread+0x1d0/0x2f8)
(worker_thread+0x1d0/0x2f8)     from (kthread+0x7c/0x84)
(kthread+0x7c/0x84)             from (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

Had imx_set_termios() been called prior to the imx_transmit_buffer(), UCR2_IRTS would have been set and disaster avoided.

So one workaround is to set UCR2_IRTS in imx_startup() as per the patch on the end of this email. This still wouldn't cater for other cases where RTS/CTS is in use but not asserted by a peripheral (or the pin mux/pad isn't correctly setup/routed), or that termios() is called while data is blocked waiting for CTS/RTS. The drain loop should probably implement a timeout and WARN(), but I'm not sure if it should also use a completion and interrupt to be correct - other serial drivers don't appear to do this though?

Anyway, the lockup is nasty, so hopefully can be triaged?

Regards,

Mike

Signed-off-by: Michael McTernan <Michael.McTernan.2001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff -Naurp orig/imx.c fixed/imx.c
--- orig/imx.c  2012-05-20 10:37:20.320041462 +0100
+++ fixed/imx.c 2012-05-20 11:18:28.512657377 +0100
@@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ static int imx_startup(struct uart_port
        writel(temp, sport->port.membase + UCR1);

        temp = readl(sport->port.membase + UCR2);
+       if (!sport->have_rtscts) {
+                       temp |= UCR2_IRTS;
+       }
        temp |= (UCR2_RXEN | UCR2_TXEN);
        writel(temp, sport->port.membase + UCR2);




_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter