Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:54:15AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20.dtsi between commit 7cb2e629a240 ("ARM:
> > AT91: Add ADC driver to the at91sam9g20 dtsi") from the staging tree and
> > commit 5b6089cb6f28 ("ARM: at91: add at91sam9260 DT support") from the
> > arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > So, I didn't know what to do with this, so I used the arm-soc version of
> > this file (effectively throwing away the staging tree change).  Hints,
> > anyone?
> 
> I suspect the addition of the adc node should just go into the
> at91sam9260.dtsi file.

So does that mean that the staging tree version is correct?  Or that
someone needs to send me a fixup patch here?

confused,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [CentOS ARM]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]

  Powered by Linux