Hello Arnd, --- On Tue, 15/5/12, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Did you miss a dependency? Should I revert that > patch for > > > now? > > > > hx4700.c expects to find the clock_rate field in the > > asic3_platform_data structure. > > > > The clock_rate field is due to be added in V3.5: > > > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1204.2/00339.html > > > > This is not good, you should not split patches in a way that > breaks > the individual pieces. It would have been better to just > take the entire > patch through either arm-soc or the mfd tree. > > Any suggestions for a way out of this mess? I'm inclined to > just > revert the patch I have and let Samuel pick it up to submit > it along > with the other half. I apologise if it's causing problems; I was trying to avoid crossing maintainer boundaries. Revert it and I'll resubmit it unchanged for V3.6. Regards, Paul _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel