On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:22:01AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > static void __init imx53_dt_init(void) > > { > > struct device_node *node; > > @@ -99,6 +115,9 @@ static void __init imx53_dt_init(void) > > of_node_put(node); > > } > > > > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx53-qsb")) > > + imx53_qsb_init(); > > + > > I wonder if we really want to open this can of worms here. Adding board > specific hacks (or fixups) in this file can become very messy once we > have more than only a few oftree based boards. > >From what I have seen, this is an acceptable solution to board specific setup. What's the alternative on your mind? -- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel