Re: [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Friday 11 May 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Right. Personally, I would be fine with either of my v8 (all banks in
> dt, referenced naturally by name) and v9 (one simple DT entry for the
> whole GPIO controller, integer index for referencing banks) patches.
> 
> Consider the DT-documented mapping in the latter case:
> 
>       0: GPIO P0
>       1: GPIO P1
>       2: GPIO P2
>       3: GPIO P3
>       4: GPI P3
>       5: GPO P3
> 
> Not too difficult and would also be acceptable, IMO.
> 
> So Arnd and Grant, please agree one of those and pick it. :-)
> 

Grant is maintainer for both GPIO and DT, so his opinion is what
counts in this case.
I was merely giving the background on how we got there so he
can make an informed decision.

	Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter