Re: i.MX USB Re-Structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Dear Sascha Hauer,

> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:05:24PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> > 
> > Recently, Alexander Shishkin has posted new chipidea patchset
> > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg62975.html)
> > to support USB driver who use chipidea core. In his structure,
> > all controller related files (like ehci-mxc.c, fsl-udc-core.c, etc)
> > will be drivers/usb/chipidea, and no related file will be host, gadget
> > and otg again.
> > 
> > So, it will be different with marek has posted i.mx28 USB driver,
> > and also different with your proposal in the past. But I think
> > you and marek may prefer Alexander's structure, and would like
> > use it for i.mx in future, correct?
> 
> I was not aware of this patchset. I only had a short look at it, but
> yes, it seems to be the way to go, for all SoCs supporting this
> hardware, be it i.MX, MXS or something else.

Correct, I can't but agree here.

> Sascha

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter