On 05/04/2012 04:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [120504 11:59]: >> On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [120504 08:58]: >>>> On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> so I was thinking to do like on gpio >>>>>> >>>>>> uart { >>>>>> pin = < &pioA 12 {pararms} > >>>>>> >>>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Hmm I assume the "12" above the gpio number? >>>> no pin number in the bank because it could not be gpio >>> >>> Yes OK, but pin number 12 in the gpio bank, not in the mux register. >>> Got it. >> >> I'd prefer to avoid any references to GPIOs here; not all muxable pins >> are GPIOs and not all GPIOs are muxable pins. Lets keep the two concepts >> independent. > > And it seems that &pioA 12 is not always enough information for the pinctrl > driver to request a GPIO. So it's best to specify it separately. Why would a pinctrl driver "request a GPIO"? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel