On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > It does result in the really odd situation that the number that gets > stored in the resource is the register number plus an offset. If > anything I'd expect that the resources would be defined so you had to > add the parent base address with the child resource being the offset > within the parent resource. Though to be honest the parent resource is > almost always going to be numbered from zero so it's not going to make > much difference most of the time. But that's not how any of the other resources work: AFAICT, each resource type makes up an address space with unique ranges assigned to each sibling and sub-ranges inside of that for its children. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel