|
|
RE: [PATCH 00/33] Use common macro to define resources |
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent > > people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as > > we've had in the past. > > One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with wrong > endings (because people kept thinking it was exclusive rather than > inclusive) - and the resulting stream of additional patches to fix those > errors. > > The legacy platforms do have those kinds of errors - when I converted > SA11x0 as part of a previous patch set, I found a number suffering from > this error. (Were any found in this patch set? I've not read through > it.) > > I think if this becomes a small %age of the change to Samsung stuff, > and Kukjin is happy with it, it should go in. Yes, agree. I will apply this whole series. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |