|
|
Re: [PATCH 02/13] ARM: OMAP5: Add minimal support for OMAP5430 SOC |
* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [120507 12:22]: > * Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [120507 12:11]: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 4 May 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > How about we add CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3PLUS in the clean-up series? > > > Then this becomes just: > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3PLUS > > > > We might want to consider having separate CONFIG_SOC_* values for each > > SoC. So rather than CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3PLUS, we'd have CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3430, > > CONFIG_SOC_OMAP3630, etc. > > Hmm but this would be in addition to the SOC specific options. The goal > is to cut down the ifdeffery needed all over the place to add new SoCs, > see the experimental patch I posted: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg67938.html Of course we could make this finer grained based on features like SOC_HAS_XYZ or SOC_HAS_OMAP3PLUS_PRMXYZBITS if you have some grouping like that in mind. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |