On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a > > significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile, > > sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one > > uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with > > Renesas. > > I see. So your opinion is that it may have more in common with the other > ARM-based platforms? Not with any one in particular, although there are a lot of similarities between recent Cortex-A9 based designs. I just think it would be more logical to put the files into a new mach-emma directory in the same way that every other family has its own directory. As I said, I don't mind if you share infrastructure with mach-shmobile, like using the same mach/*.h header files, but if you end up sharing actual code, it would be nicer to put it into some location where it can also be shared by other platforms. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel