Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch/arm/mach-* late_initcall cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wednesday 02 May 2012, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On a related note, do you plan to do the same thing for subsys_initcall?
> > 
> I was asked by Russell to clean up late_initcall when I was trying to
> propose some something to help imx cpuidle drivers, so I did not really
> plan to do the same thing for subsys_initcall.  However, since you are
> asking, I think I can do it.  But I would defer it a little bit until
> we have device tree kill some amount of board files.

Ok, fair enough. I don't see a reason to rush the subsys_initcall conversion,
it just felt odd to do it for late_initcall first when there are so many more
instances of subsys_initcall in arch/arm. We can also ask the next person
who wants to add a subsys_initcall to do that work, so you don't have to
do it all by yourself ;-)

	Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter