On Wednesday 02 May 2012, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On a related note, do you plan to do the same thing for subsys_initcall? > > > I was asked by Russell to clean up late_initcall when I was trying to > propose some something to help imx cpuidle drivers, so I did not really > plan to do the same thing for subsys_initcall. However, since you are > asking, I think I can do it. But I would defer it a little bit until > we have device tree kill some amount of board files. Ok, fair enough. I don't see a reason to rush the subsys_initcall conversion, it just felt odd to do it for late_initcall first when there are so many more instances of subsys_initcall in arch/arm. We can also ask the next person who wants to add a subsys_initcall to do that work, so you don't have to do it all by yourself ;-) Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel