CPUFREQ maintainence.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

This last few releases I've been more of a hindrance than help to getting
some of the patches merged upstream, so due to my lack of time, I'm considering
removing myself as maintainer, and having patches routed as such instead...

ARM -> Russell/relevant ARM subtree maintainers
x86 driver patches -> x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(All the other archs currently supported already go through the arch trees mips/sparc etc)

The core doesn't see a huge amount of change these days, I figure patches for
that can just go to lkml & Linus/Andrew like any other subsystem.

comments?

	Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter