|
|
Re: [PATCH 01/11] dma: imx-sdma: make channel0 operations atomic |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:52:10PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 16:41 +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:51:40PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:02 +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > > > device_prep_dma_cyclic may be call in audio trigger function which is > > > > atomic context, so we make it atomic too. > > > No this is wrong behavior. You should not call dma prepare functions in > > > any of the sound trigger calls. It would make sense to move this in > > > sound prepare callback. > > Then, could you please doc it somewhere? I think I'm not the only one > > confused. > See the soc-dmaengine.c for correct behavior! Do you mean sound/soc/soc-dmaengine-pcm.c ? It's where it calls dma prepare in trigger function. snd_dmaengine_pcm_trigger --> dmaengine_pcm_prepare_and_submit --> dmaengine_prep_dma_cyclic > I can document only dmaengine behavior (which is already there) Sure, I mean, can you doc in include/linux/dmaengine.h that dmaengine_prep_xxx may sleep? > and not > how each subsystem should use this. People is subsystems need to see how > to use the dmaengine APIs sanely Thanks Richard > > > -- > ~Vinod > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |