Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: support gpio request deferred probing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:17:26AM +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 03:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> As pinctrl handles, it may be possible the pinctrl gpio ranges
> >> are still not got registered when user call pinctrl_gpio_request.
> >> Thus, add defer support for it too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Since nobody is saying anything and it looks reasonable,
> > I just applied this.
> 
> I didn't look at this, because V4 was sent without this patch, so I
> assumed it'd been dropped by Dong. Was I wrong?
> 
I thought this patch had no relationship with dummy state v4 patch and
it had no changes, so i did not resend it out with the v4 patch again.
It did not mean drop. Sorry for causing confusing.
Anyway thanks for your attention.

Regards
Dong Aisheng


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter