|
|
Re: [PATCH V2] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT probing support for ARM mpcore watchdog |
On 23/04/12 12:35, viresh kumar wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Irk! Have you actually tested this? > > Yes. But with incorrect base address. I passed timers address by mistake. Ah, that explains why it worked. I suppose you do have additional patches that fix the IRQ request bit? >> The DT binding indicates: >> - reg : Specify the base address and the size of the TWD watchdog >> register window. >> >> while all the offsets in smp_twd.h are expressed in bytes from the TWD >> *timer* base. So you have to either fix these offsets (which breaks >> potential users of the non-DT version of the driver), or correct the >> base when using DT. > > You are correct. Which one do you prefer: > - Change bindings to pass timers base address No. We already discussed this on LAK, and the outcome was the current binding, so let's not change that again. > - subtract 0x20 from base address for DT case That's a possibility. > - something else. Given that no in-tree platform seem to be using this watchdog (at least a quick grep didn't reveal anything), I'd be inclined to simply change the offset in smp_twd.h and let them break. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |